What do you think about the presence of the US military on foreign soil?

This poll operates like a wiki: feel free to update its summary and, if applicable, add a new, better option to the poll itself.

With hundreds of military bases around the world, the US has an inordinate amount of military personal being sent to and stationed on foreign soil.
Whether they are in a country at peace or sent to harm's way within a military conflict, what do you think about US military presence on foreign soil? How much is reasonable? What conditions would make their presence there — or their withdrawal — acceptable?

Rate from 0 to 10 on proposed statements according to how much you agree with them.

We have not (yet) found a resource with an exact count of the number and the size of US military bases abroad. However, see this wikipedia article: List of United States military bases.

Manifesto listing:
Policy wiki:

Choice Blog entries Score votes Maximum score
72.5 % A certain amount of US military bases abroad is necessary for strategic and geopolitical purposes. 0 29 4 40
65 % The presence abroad of the US military is necessary for the US to defend its own borders. 1 entry 26 4 40
60 % Large portions of the US military should be reconverted for exclusive humanitarian purposes (e.g. disaster relief...) 0 24 4 40
50 % The US military should be drastically cut down, with the bulk of the cut being made in bases abroad. 1 entry 20 4 40
45 % The money previously spent on the military should be used to create jobs and rebuild infrastructure within the US. 1 entry 18 4 40
42.5 % Bring home all U.S. troops and close down the hundreds of US military bases around the world. 1 entry 17 4 40
20 % Military ships, submarines, and planes can be used for low-budget travel and tourism. 1 entry 8 4 40
10 % The US military should close *all* of its military bases abroad. 1 entry 3 3 30

Check the blog entry discussing this poll.